Last edited Timestamp?
Author : Tim Graham
ticket : #1356
Branch : BRANCH_NAME
Description
This development consists of two parts:
1) Updates to the CICE interface to allow the use of CICE5. Several variable names have chanegd between CICE4 and CICE5. A new cpp key will be required as the new CICE5 variable names are included within a USE statement at the top of sbcice_cice.f90
2) Introduction of salinity dependent freezing temperature that can be passed to ice and atmosphere models. This is required when sea-ice data assimilation is used and is also more physically correct.
Part 1 will be implemented by Tim Graham Part 2 will be implemented by Dave Storkey
Testing
All parts of this will be tested in SETTE. Further testing to be decided
| NVTK Tested | '''YES/NO''' |
| Other model configurations | '''YES/NO''' |
| Processor configurations tested | [ Enter processor configs tested here ] |
| If adding new functionality please confirm that the New code doesn't change results when it is switched off and ''works'' when switched on | '''YES/NO/NA''' |
(Answering UNSURE is likely to generate further questions from reviewers.)
'Please add further summary details here'
- Processor configurations tested
- etc----
Bit Comparability
| Does this change preserve answers in your tested standard configurations (to the last bit) ? | '''YES/NO ''' |
| Does this change bit compare across various processor configurations. (1xM, Nx1 and MxN are recommended) | '''YES/NO''' |
| Is this change expected to preserve answers in all possible model configurations? | '''YES/NO''' |
| Is this change expected to preserve all diagnostics? ,,''Preserving answers in model runs does not necessarily imply preserved diagnostics. '' | '''YES/NO''' |
If you answered '''NO''' to any of the above, please provide further details:
- Which routine(s) are causing the difference?
- Why the changes are not protected by a logical switch or new section-version
- What is needed to achieve regression with the previous model release (e.g. a regression branch, hand-edits etc). If this is not possible, explain why not.
- What do you expect to see occur in the test harness jobs?
- Which diagnostics have you altered and why have they changed?Please add details here........
System Changes
| Does your change alter namelists? | '''YES/NO ''' |
| Does your change require a change in compiler options? | '''YES/NO ''' |
If any of these apply, please document the changes required here.......
Resources
''Please ''summarize'' any changes in runtime or memory use caused by this change......''
IPR issues
| Has the code been wholly (100%) produced by NEMO developers staff working exclusively on NEMO? | '''YES/ NO ''' |
If No:
- Identify the collaboration agreement details
- Ensure the code routine header is in accordance with the agreement, (Copyright/Redistribution? etc).Add further details here if required..........
