#356 closed Enhancement (fixed)
eosbn2: should we update the equation of state ?
| Reported by: | lesommer | Owned by: | gm |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | low | Milestone: | |
| Component: | OCE | Version: | |
| Severity: | Keywords: | EOS | |
| Cc: |
Description
I think we should consider using the new, more accurate and less expensive equation of state by :
McDougall?, T. J., D. R. Jackett, D. G. Wright, and R. Feistel, Accurate and computationally efficient algorithms for potential temperature and density of seawater, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 2003.
html
see e.g. the mitgcm online documentation
Commit History (0)
(No commits)
Change History (5)
comment:1 Changed 14 years ago by anonymous
- Milestone 2009 Stream 3: New features deleted
comment:2 Changed 14 years ago by gm
It seems better to bypass the McDougall? et al 2003 eos and consider the new standard eos (http://www.teos-10.org/)
Gurvan
comment:3 Changed 12 years ago by gm
- Owner changed from NEMO team to gm
Work on the implementation of eos10 including a boussinesq eos10 version is currently undertake at Stockholm (F. Roquet with the collaboration of Trevor McDougall? and myself)
hopefully available for every body with 1 or 2 years.
Gurvan
comment:4 Changed 10 years ago by gm
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from new to closed
Introduction of TEOS10 is CNRS-1 item of 2014 workplan (see #1294).
comment:5 Changed 8 years ago by nicolasmartin
- Keywords EOS added; eosbn2 removed
Milestone 2009 Stream 3: New features deleted