r1013cwrr
This is the first evaluation at fluxnet sites of the CWRR scheme after the merge into the trunk version.
It is compared here to revision r1013 with the Choisnel-based scheme.
For most sites, diagnostic variables and time frequencies, the modeled fluxes are much less correlated with the observation with CWRR than with the Choisnel scheme.
The standard deviation of the modeled fluxes is also much lower than the one observed.
The less impacted vegetation type is the Grassland type for which the results with CWRR are relatively comparable to those obtained with Choisnel.
CRO sites
all sites
DBF sites
all sites
EBF sites
all sites
ENF sites
all sites
GRA sites
all sites
WSA sites
all sites
