Changes between Version 8 and Version 9 of ticket/1851/General
- Timestamp:
- 2017-02-22T15:47:19+01:00 (7 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
ticket/1851/General
v8 v9 110 110 111 111 So the fact that our original code runs at all is pure blind luck! 112 This all looks very unsafe but I can't find a way to keep it in bounds w/o altering results....! 112 This all looks very unsafe but I can't find a way to keep it in bounds when setting up the indexes w/o altering results....! 113 The only way I can do it is by introducing a check in scatter_global_ext (which is the variant issuing the error) to explicitly exclude negative J indices. That works OK but it seems a bit of a cludge. 113 114