Changes between Version 7 and Version 8 of ticket/1331_UKMO2_ice_shelves

Timestamp:

2014-07-03T19:07:03+02:00 (10 years ago)

Author:

mathiot

Comment:

--

ticket/1331_UKMO2_ice_shelves

@@ -55 +55 @@
 
 === Bit Comparability ===
-||Does this change preserve answers in your tested standard configurations (to the last bit) ?||!'''NO'''||
+||Does this change preserve answers in your tested standard configurations (to the last bit) ?||'''NO'''||
 ||Does this change bit compare across various processor configurations. (1xM, Nx1 and MxN are recommended)||'''YES''' in ISOMIP configuration (not yet tested for the other configurations)||
-||Is this change expected to preserve answers in all possible model configurations?||!'''NO'''||
-||Is this change expected to preserve all diagnostics? [[BR]]!,,!''Preserving answers in model runs does not necessarily imply preserved diagnostics. !''||!'''NO'''||
+||Is this change expected to preserve answers in all possible model configurations?||'''NO'''||
+||Is this change expected to preserve all diagnostics? [[BR]]!,,!''Preserving answers in model runs does not necessarily imply preserved diagnostics. !''||'''NO'''||
 
 If you answered !'''NO!''' to any of the above, please provide further details:
 
  * Which routine(s) are causing the difference?
-   - XXXX TODO
- * Why the changes are not protected by a logical switch or new section-version
+This have been only tested in GYRE configuration with bump at the bottom and ln_zps activated.
+   - domzgr.F90: For ice shelves, I need to define the the e3t/u/v/w=zt/u/v/w(k+1) - zt/u/v/w(k). If not, dep3w(i,j,k) (could be) .NE. dep3w(i,j+1,k) in the full wet cell beneath the ice shelf. 
+   - zpshde.F90
+   - dynhpg.F90
+ * Why the changes are not protected by a logical switch or new section-version?
  * What is needed to achieve regression with the previous model release (e.g. a regression branch, hand-edits etc). If this is not possible, explain why not.
-   - XXXX TODO
+   - domzgr.F90: Need to replace definition of gdep3w_0, e3uw_0 and e3vw_0, and e3t_1d and e3w_1d by the reference 3.6 version code
+   - zpshde.F90: The easiest thing to do is to keep the header and the variable definition. 
+   - dynhpg.F90: The easiest thing to do is to replace this routine by the reference 3.6 version.
  * What do you expect to see occur in the test harness jobs?
  * Which diagnostics have you altered and why have they changed?Please add details here........