New URL for NEMO forge!   http://forge.nemo-ocean.eu

Since March 2022 along with NEMO 4.2 release, the code development moved to a self-hosted GitLab.
This present forge is now archived and remained online for history.
WorkingGroups/AGRIF (diff) – NEMO

Changes between Version 7 and Version 8 of WorkingGroups/AGRIF


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2014-03-26T14:27:51+01:00 (10 years ago)
Author:
topex
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • WorkingGroups/AGRIF

    v7 v8  
    11[[TOC(heading=AGRIF,AGRIF/*, depth=1)]] 
    22 
    3 = '''AGRIF''' =  
    4  
     3= '''AGRIF''' = 
    54Working group leader (and responsible for wiki pages): Laurent Debreu 
    65 
    7  
    86== Members of the working group: == 
    9  
    10 * Laurent Debreu 
    11 * Sébastien Masson  
    12 * Jérôme Chanut  
    13 * Simona Flavoni  
    14 * Rachel Furner 
    15  
     7 * Laurent Debreu 
     8 * Sébastien Masson 
     9 * Jérôme Chanut 
     10 * Simona Flavoni 
     11 * Rachel Furner 
    1612 
    1713== Objectives: == 
    18  
    1914Precise the needs on their application. Involved in defining priorities in workplan 
    2015 
    21  
    2216== Agenda: == 
    23  
    24  
    2517---- 
    26  
    2718== List of past/current/planned applications of NEMO with AGRIF (with associated publications): == 
    28  
    29191) Applications in GEOMAR-Kiel (Germany) 
    3020 
    31 Agulhas current, etc). There are probably 15 papers or so (including Biastoch et al, Nature, 2008 and 2009). The best would be to ask the complete list from Arne Biastoch (if we need it in the prospective document).  
    32  
     21Agulhas current, etc). There are probably 15 papers or so (including Biastoch et al, Nature, 2008 and 2009). The best would be to ask the complete list from Arne Biastoch (if we need it in the prospective document). 
    3322 
    34232) Applications in France 
    3524 
    36 - AGRIF 1/15 degree zoom in the Labrador Sea in a 1/3 degree model. PhD work of Jerome Chanut,  
     25 * AGRIF 1/15 degree zoom in the Labrador Sea in a 1/3 degree model. PhD work of Jerome Chanut, 
    3726 
    3827Chanut J., B. Barnier, W. Large, L. Debreu, T. Penduff, J.-M. Molines, and P. Mathiot, 2008 : Mesoscale eddies in the Labrador Sea and their contribution to convection and re-stratification. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 38, 1617-1643. 
    3928 
    40 - AGRIF in the bay of Biscay, comparison with open boundary strategies. PhD of Sylvain Cailleau,  
     29 * AGRIF in the bay of Biscay, comparison with open boundary strategies. PhD of Sylvain Cailleau, 
    4130 
    4231Cailleau S., V. Fedorenko, B. Barnier, E. Blayo, and L. Debreu, 2008: Comparison of different numerical methods used to handle the open boundary of a regional ocean circulation model of the Bay of Biscay. Ocean Modelling, 25, 1-16. 
    4332 
    44 - AGRIF in the Solomon Sea, PhD work of Angelique Melet. JPO 2010 and other papers (5 in all? to be verified) 
     33 * AGRIF in the Solomon Sea, PhD work of Angelique Melet. JPO 2010 and other papers (5 in all? to be verified) 
    4534 
    4635Melet A., Gourdeau L., Kessler S., Verron J. and Molines J.-M., 2010: Thermocline circulation in the Solomon Sea: a modeling study. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 40, 1302-1319. 
    4736 
    48 Melet A., Verron J., Gourdeau L., and Koch-Larrouy A., 2011: Equatorward Pathways of Solomon Sea Water Masses and Their Modifications. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 41(4), 810-826.  
    49  
    50 - AGRIF in the Gulf of Mexico, PhD work of Julien Jouanno.  
     37Melet A., Verron J., Gourdeau L., and Koch-Larrouy A., 2011: Equatorward Pathways of Solomon Sea Water Masses and Their Modifications. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 41(4), 810-826. 
     38 
     39 * AGRIF in the Gulf of Mexico, PhD work of Julien Jouanno. 
    5140 
    5241Jouanno J., J Sheinbaum, B. Barnier, J. M. Molines, L. Debreu, and F. Lemarié, 2008: The mesoscale variability in the Caribbean Sea. Part I: simulations with an embedded model and characteristics, Ocean Modelling, 23, 82-101. 
    5342 
    54 Jouanno J., J Sheinbaum, B. Barnier, J. M. Molines, 2009: The mesoscale variability in the Caribbean Sea. Part II: energy sources. Ocean Modelling, 26 (3-4), pp. 226-239.  
     43Jouanno J., J Sheinbaum, B. Barnier, J. M. Molines, 2009: The mesoscale variability in the Caribbean Sea. Part II: energy sources. Ocean Modelling, 26 (3-4), pp. 226-239. 
    5544 
    5645Jouanno J., Sheinbaum J., Barnier B., Molines J.-M., Candela J., 2012: Seasonal and interannual modulation of the eddy kinetic energy in the Caribbean Sea.  Journal of Physical Oceanography, 42, 2041-2055, DOI: 10.1175/JPO-D-12-048.1. 
    5746 
    58  
    59 - AGRIF in the Med Sea 
    60  
    61 Dobrinski P., Anav A., Lebeaupin Brossier C., Samson G., Stéfanon M., Bastin S., Baklouti M., Béranger K., Beuvier J., Bourdallé-Badie R., Coquart L., D'Andrea F., De Noblet-Ducoudré N., Diaz F., Dutay J.-C., Ethe C., Foujols M.-A., Khvorostyanov D., Madec G., Mancip M., Masson S., Menut L., Palmieri J., Polcher J. Turquety S., Valcke S., Viovy N., 2012: Modelling the Regional Coupled Eatrh System (MORCE):application to process and climate studies in vulnerable regions. Env. Modelling and Software, 35, 1-18 (10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.01.017)  
    62  
    63 - AGRIF in the Gulf of Guinea: PhD of Henrick Berger (LPO, Brest, december 2012). 
     47 * AGRIF in the Med Sea 
     48 
     49Dobrinski P., Anav A., Lebeaupin Brossier C., Samson G., Stéfanon M., Bastin S., Baklouti M., Béranger K., Beuvier J., Bourdallé-Badie R., Coquart L., D'Andrea F., De Noblet-Ducoudré N., Diaz F., Dutay J.-C., Ethe C., Foujols M.-A., Khvorostyanov D., Madec G., Mancip M., Masson S., Menut L., Palmieri J., Polcher J. Turquety S., Valcke S., Viovy N., 2012: Modelling the Regional Coupled Eatrh System (MORCE):application to process and climate studies in vulnerable regions. Env. Modelling and Software, 35, 1-18 (10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.01.017) 
     50 
     51 * AGRIF in the Gulf of Guinea: PhD of Henrick Berger (LPO, Brest, december 2012). 
    6452 
    6553A publication in preparation. 1/12 degree zoom in 1/4 model, H. Berger has also tried a 1/48 zoom in 1/12 model. 
    6654 
    67 - AGRIF in the Subpolar gyre: ERNA model configuration (1/8 zoom in the global ORCA05 model) 
    68  
    69 C. Talandier, J. Deshayes, A-M. Treguier, X. Capet, R. Benshila, L. Debreu, R. Dussin, J-M. Molines, G. Madec: Improvements of simulated Western North Atlantic current system and impacts on AMOC, submitted to ocean modelling. 
    70  
    71  
    72  
     55 * AGRIF in the Subpolar gyre: ERNA model configuration (1/8 zoom in the global ORCA05 model) 
     56 
     57 A. Talandier, J. Deshayes, A-M. Treguier, X. Capet, R. Benshila, L. Debreu, R. Dussin, J-M. Molines, G. Madec: Improvements of simulated Western North Atlantic current system and impacts on AMOC, submitted to ocean modelling. 
     58 
     59== REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP MEETING (January 30, 2014) == 
     60Participants : Rachid Benshila, Daley Calvert, Julien Calandreau, Jérome Chanut, Laurent Debreu, Christian Ethe, Rachel Furner, Claire Levy, Gurvan Madec, Sébastien Masson 
     61 
     62  
     63 
     641) Discuss the update of the 3.6 version 
     65 
     66  
     67 
     68History : 
     69 
     70-       AGRIF version (and corresponding NEMO subroutines) has been updated by Julien Calandreau (INRIA) and Laurent 
     71 
     72-       Jérome has made a lot of improvements and bug fixes in his Gilbraltar Strait configuration 
     73 
     74-       Same for Sébastien in the Pulsation ANR project 
     75 
     76-       Other developments in LIM, PISCES 
     77 
     78  
     79 
     80Bugs that have been identified and corrected since version 3.4 : 
     81 
     82-       zwork array (J. Chanut): a global array  « zwork » was defined in the libmpp module and (due to a bug in the AGRIF converter) this led to several problems and in particular the update step was not performed … 
     83 
     84-       Diffusion coefficients in the corners of the sponge layern were wrong (J. Chanut) 
     85 
     86-       Scale factors were not correctly computed in the ghost cells (where it is assumed that we are in full steps) (J. Chanut) 
     87 
     88è same problem for OBC 
     89 
     90-       TKE (S. Masson): near the boundaries, spatial averaging operations led to wrong Kz in the first cell inside the high resolution domain. Extrapolation is possible but does not fulfill the requirement that with, a mesh refinement factor of 1, the obtained solution of the HR grid is identical to a solution computed without a zoom. S. Masson has implemented exchanges of TKE between coarse and fine grids. 
     91 
     92è Same problem for GLS and for OBC 
     93 
     94-       Asselin Filter (J. Chanut) : when updating the « after » (n+1) fields, the corresponding corrections of the « now » fields linked with the Asselin filter were not done. 
     95 
     96-       arrays out of bound in procnames in MPI (wrong declarations of AGRIF profiles in agrif_declare_variables: jpi, jpj have been replaced by ncli,nlcj) 
     97 
     98  
     99 
     100Bugs  / Problems that have been identified 
     101 
     102·      The bathymetry connection check is not complete (add a check that the coarse grid bathy have been correctly updated) 
     103 
     104·      Reproducibility is not guaranteed (due to MPI problem) when ln_spc_dyn is set to true in namelist (which means that we take 0 as special value for dynamics in interpolations/updates). 
     105 
     106·      Recursive updates. When more than 1 zoom level are set, the update should start from the highest resolution grid and go recursively to the root grid. Laurent implemented changes that makes this possible. 
     107 
     108  
     109 
     110- Use of AGRIF for degradation online (problème de north pole, coarsening) 
     111 
     112- Average operators with update values 
     113 
     114- High order operators with coastlines 
     115 
     116  
     117 
     118- BDY problem have been solved 
     119 
     120  
     121 
     122Rachid is ready do the merge (as soon the beta version is fixed) 
     123 
     124  
     125 
     1262) What are the known problems / bugs? 
     127 
     128  
     129 
     130-       Number of ghost cells 
     131 
     132o   Antartic problem (periodicity): require only one ghost cell instead of 2 
     133 
     134o   Number of required ghost cells for high order advection schemes may be larger than 2 
     135 
     136o   -> Remove hardcoding of the number of ghost cells, do the required modifications to the AGRIF “profiles”  (Laurent) 
     137 
     138-       North fold problem ? 
     139 
     140-       Timings for each grid 
     141 
     142  
     143 
     1443) What are the main next developments? 
     145 
     146  
     147 
     148-       Time splitting (OK for version 3.6, end of the year, Jérome) 
     149 
     150o   only consider forward integration of the forcing mode permits to ensure volume conservation 
     151 
     152o   (refluxing or conservative interpolation at the boundary). 
     153 
     154o   Tells the users that we have only AGRIF working in time splitting version in the forward version of the code. 
     155 
     156-       Parallel runs (Laurent) 
     157 
     158-       Update of the parent grid rhs before barotropic step(s) 
     159 
     160  
     161 
     1624) Version 5.0 (time and space schemes in the system). 
     163 
     164  
     165 
     166  
     167 
     168-       Vertical grid refinement (Laurent) 
     169 
     170o   Probably before version 5 
     171 
     172-       Online degradation using AGRIF 
     173 
     174-       Agrif with variable volume 
     175 
     176o   (update of the volume, and modification of boundary conditions) (Jérome). 
     177 
     178  
     179 
     1805) Nesting tools: 
     181 
     182  
     183 
     184Two stages:  
     185 
     186a) for 3.6 version   
     187 
     188-       agree on all the points: bathymetry smoothing, update of coarse grids (take the maximum as default) 
     189 
     190-       Incorporate corrections done by Jean Marc 
     191 
     192-       The nesting tools are only essential for the creation of bathymetry: 
     193 
     194o   Do a list available tools for 2D/3D interpolation 
     195 
     196o   For 3.6 keep the 3D fields interpolation in nesting tools 
     197 
     198  
     199 
     200b) next version 
     201 
     202  
     203 
     204-       The definition of vertical coordinates should be done outside NEMO 
     205 
     206-       Nesting tools for the s coordinates 
     207 
     208  
     209 
     2105) Documentation: 
     211 
     212-       Update of the nesting tools 3.6 documentation 
     213 
     214-       Update of the users guide: describes what is possible or not with AGRIF. 
     215 
     216-       Documentation for nesting in NEMO/AGRIF: starts from the notes of Sebastien, then circulate the powerpoint 
     217 
     218-       GMD paper 
     219 
     220  
     221 
     2226) Standard configuration and sanity tests 
     223 
     224  
     225 
     226The standard configuration should: 
     227 
     228-       Include more than one level of embedding (test of the recursive update starting from the finer resolution grid(s)) 
     229 
     230-       Uses time splitting 
     231 
     232-       Include a zoom in a sea ice area (Labrador Sea, LIM3) 
     233 
     234-       Include a zoom with PISCES 
     235 
     236-       Zoom in Perou Chili 
     237 
     238  
     239 
     240Sanitiy tests 
     241 
     242-       Zoom with a mesh refinement of 1 
     243 
     244-       Test constancy preservation for tracers 
     245 
     246  
     247 
     248Longer visions of having AGRIF zoom in AMM 
     249 
     250S coordinates zoom inside a z coordinate parent grid.