Changes between Version 12 and Version 13 of GroupActivities/Meetings/Retreat2012


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2012-01-29T15:58:56+01:00 (13 years ago)
Author:
peylin
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • GroupActivities/Meetings/Retreat2012

    v12 v13  
    1010 
    1111==== Nathalie Denoblet (presentation) ==== 
    12  
    1312 * Presentation of the history of ORCHIDEE developments and the current imbalance in the level of complexity between the hydrology and the carbon cycle. 
    1413 * Emphasize on the need to harmonize the level of complexity and reinforce the evaluation strategy including evaluation of the coupled mode. 
     
    1615 * Reinforce the developments on agro-systems 
    1716 
     17==== Philippe Ciais (presentation) ==== 
     18 * Need to work on the consistency between developments 
     19 * Raised out attention on the possible use of ORCHIDEE by industrial/private compagny; Intellectual property need to be  
     20 * Why not going to a reference very high resolution (1 km) simulation 
     21 * Potential of the Near real time application and maybe to "sell" ORCHIDEE for a use within ECMWF 
    1822 
    19 === Philippe Ciais (presentation) === 
     23==== Agnes Ducharne (presentation) ==== 
     24 * Focussed her vision on the hydrology 
     25 * Need to adress carefully lateral flows when going to high spatial resolution 
     26 * Do not forget the spatial variations of soil properties! 
     27 * Need to Include a link with ground water over areas with shallow water table  
    2028 
    21 * Agnes Ducharne: 
     29==== Sebastiaan Luyssaert (presentation) ==== 
     30 * We may need to move from climate science focuss (central in the past activities) to descision making strategy (including some integrated quantities like wood production or food supply,...) 
     31 * Land Manadgement becomes crucial 
     32 * Move from PFTs to species (group of species) 
     33 * Include the rivers as an ecosystem 
    2234 
    23 * Sebastiaan Luyssaert: 
    2435 
    2536We then had a fruitfull discussion on the different directions raised by the intial presentation. The discussion was supported by few slides presented by volunteers  together with additional slides