| | 4 | = 04/12/2023 - 2nd meeting to discuss the ongoing action around the grass/crop management in the model = |
| | 5 | Present: PP, DG, RL, KN, NVio, NdN, BG |
| | 6 | PP, KN, DG,RL, NdN, NVio, BG |
| | 7 | |
| | 8 | Kim present her project where she will developed ORCHIDEE on the agriculture with a focus over Italy |
| | 9 | |
| | 10 | The others detailed a bit the ongoing project (see previous meeting notes). |
| | 11 | |
| | 12 | DG said that Yang Su did a work on the constrain for winter wheat, he tried on maize but not enough data to be as good as for winter wheat. |
| | 13 | |
| | 14 | '''We need a comparison between ORCHIDEE-CROP and ORCHIDEE trunk''' |
| | 15 | |
| | 16 | NVio can help on that and he will prepare a comparison between ORCHIDEE-CROP/ORCHIDEE TRUNK. PP will ask NVui and Mojtaba if they can have also help. A comparison version of model paper could be a way to coordinate the effort. |
| | 17 | |
| | 18 | |
| | 19 | '''An integration plan''' |
| | 20 | |
| | 21 | The idea would be developp specific crop aspects into the CROP version and then take what is needed into the trunk. For ESM2025 NVui will do it in the v3. |
| | 22 | |
| | 23 | If we add all the details that are in CROP it could be then complicated to parametrize everything in the trunk. |
| | 24 | |
| | 25 | We might consider 2 different objectives: working on impact vs. working on climate issues. CROP could be used for impact studies and the trunk for the feedbacks with climate. |
| | 26 | |
| | 27 | We must rank the needs instead of list the needs and then implement everything. |
| | 28 | |
| | 29 | What is the status of STICS. We should keep contact with them |
| | 30 | |
| | 31 | Next meeting early Feb. |
| | 32 | |
| | 33 | |
| | 34 | |
