| 71 | |
| 72 | == Milly's correction == |
| 73 | |
| 74 | This correction is presently introduced in the code to estimate the potential evaporation of Budyko (or Penman-Monteith, or Thornthwaite), i.e. Ep = rau/ra*[qsat(T*)-qa], or Ep(T*). |
| 75 | |
| 76 | This potential evaporation is smaller than the one of ORCHIDEE, which is Ep(Ts)=rau/ra*[qsat(T*)-qa]. |
| 77 | |
| 78 | Milly, 1992 (Document 6) applies a first-order linearisation of qsat(T) around Ta (like in the derivation of the Penman formula for wet surface evaporation, see Document 7) for qsat(T*) and qsat(Ts). The expressions of Ep(T*) and Ep(Ts) are then found by using the unstressed/stressed energy budget equation respectively (in which the upward LW term is also linearized). |
| 79 | |
| 80 | The resulting link between Ep(T*) and Ep(Ts) is given by Equation 17 of Milly, 1992, which is equivalent to equation E14 of Patricia's de Rosnay's PhD thesis. They can be written as: |
| 81 | Ep(T*) = Ep(Ts)*b/(a+b), |
| 82 | |
| 83 | a = rau*cp_air/ra + chalev0*rau*delta*vbeta/ra + 4*emis*c_stefan* Ta^3 |
| 84 | |
| 85 | b = chalev0*rau*delta*(1-vbeta)/ra |
| 86 | |
| 87 | delta is the derivative of qsat(T) at Ta |
| 88 | |
| 89 | This is equivalent to the equations in the code (in enerbil_flux), if one replaces vbeta by vevapp(ji)/evapot(ji), delta by grad_qsat(ji), and ra by 1/qc. |
| 90 | |
| 91 | In this development, one (= Agnès) can question the validity of linearizing qsat(T*) around Ta, as T* can become very different from Ta, especially in dry areas/period. |
| 92 | |