Changes between Version 5 and Version 6 of DevelopmentActivities/Xios/Validation

Timestamp:

2014-01-21T10:08:59+01:00 (10 years ago)

Author:

jgipsl

Comment:

--

DevelopmentActivities/Xios/Validation

@@ -5 +5 @@
 == Conclusion ==
  * No difference in results between IOIPSL and XIOS output for instaneous output frequency. 
- * Small differencies when the output is an average over several time steps : the output in Sechiba differs on the last significativs number for a few variables. All variables in Stomate are the same. 
+ * Small differencies when the output is an average over several time steps : the output in Sechiba differs on the last significativs number for a few variables(lwdown, q2m, qair, swdown, t2m, tair). All variables in Stomate are the same. 
+ * The start date has to be treated properly in the set up phase (in the configuration, by orchidee_ol.driver)
 
 == Details on simulations ==
@@ -36 +37 @@
 
 == Time axes problem ==
-Dans IOIPSL : OK
+The start date, the time origin and calendar type is set in iodef.xml when using XIOS. These parameters have to be updated in the set up phase before each execution. This is not yet done. Therefor the time axis is start from zero each exectution even for a simulation starting from restart files. These parameters could be updated properly by the orchidee_ol.driver. [[BR]]
+
+In IOIPSL : OK
  * 19820101_19820102_1D_stomate_history.nc : time_counter = 43200, 129600 
  * 19820103_19820104_1D_stomate_history.nc : time_counter = 216000, 302400
 
-Dans XIOS : PB!!!
+In XIOS : PB!!
  * 19820101_19820102_1D_stomate_history_xios.nc : time_counter = 43200, 129600
  * 19820103_19820104_1D_stomate_history_xios.nc : time_counter = 43200, 129600