| 60 | | * The old allocation scheme in original 1.9.5.2 was run for: (1) one pixel, (2) 10 years, (3) without restart file and (4) for all forest PFTs on a single pixel. |
| 61 | | * The old allocation scheme in the new code was run for 10 years without restart file for all forest PFTs on a single pixel (home/users/sluys/MY_DEBUG/config/ORCHIDEE_OL/MYSIM1). The simulation appeared stable over 10 years. |
| 62 | | * The outcome was identical to the outcome of the old allocation scheme in the new code. |
| 63 | | * The old allocation scheme in the new code was run for 10 years without restart file for PFT6 (home/users/sluys/MY_DEBUG/config/ORCHIDEE_OL/MYSIM1) |
| 64 | | * The new allocation scheme was run for 10 years without restart file for PFT6 (home/users/sluys/MY_DEBUG/config/ORCHIDEE_OL/MYSIM3). The simulation appeared stable over 10 years. |
| | 60 | * TEST 1: The old allocation scheme (flag STOMATE_FUNCTIONAL_ALLOCATION is not available) in the tag 1.9.5.2 was run for: (1) one pixel (52-53N, 6-7E), (2) 2 years, (3) without restart file, (4) with NCC forcing and (5) for all forest PFTs on a single pixel. The configuration can be found at home/users/sluys/MY_1_9_5_2/config/ORCHIDEE_OL/MYDEBUG1. |
| | 61 | * TEST 2: The old allocation scheme (flag STOMATE_FUNCTIONAL_ALLOCATION = n) in the adjusted 1.9.5.2 code was run for: (1) one pixel (52-53N, 6-7E), (2) 2 years, (3) without restart file, (4) with NCC forcing and (5) for all forest PFTs on a single pixel. The configuration can be found at home/users/sluys/MY_DEBUG/config/ORCHIDEE_OL/MYDEBUG2. |
| | 62 | * TEST 1: The new allocation scheme (flag STOMATE_FUNCTIONAL_ALLOCATION = y) in the adjusted 1.9.5.2 code was run for: (1) one pixel (52-53N, 6-7E), (2) 10 years, (3) without restart file, (4) with NCC forcing and (5) for all forest PFTs on a single pixel. The configuration can be found at home/users/sluys/MMY_DEBUG/config/ORCHIDEE_OL/MYDEBUG3. |
| | 63 | |
| | 64 | * Conclusion TEST 1 vs TEST 2: the outcome was identical to the outcome of the old allocation scheme in the new code. |
| | 65 | * Conclusion TEST 3: the new allocation appeared stable over 10 years for all tree PFT's |
| | 66 | * Conclusion TEST 2 vs TEST 3: new allocation has substantial less NPP due to substantial higher Ra |
