Changes between Version 9 and Version 10 of DevelopmentActivities/ORCHIDEE-DOFOCO


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2012-07-13T12:19:34+02:00 (12 years ago)
Author:
luyssaert
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • DevelopmentActivities/ORCHIDEE-DOFOCO

    v9 v10  
    6262        * TEST 3: The new allocation scheme (flag STOMATE_FUNCTIONAL_ALLOCATION = y) in the adjusted 1.9.5.2 (rev 712) code was run for: (1) one pixel (52-53N, 6-7E), (2) 10 years, (3) without restart file, (4) with NCC forcing and (5) for all forest PFTs on a single pixel. The configuration can be found at home/users/sluys/MMY_DEBUG/config/ORCHIDEE_OL/MYDEBUG3. 
    6363 
    64         * Conclusion TEST 1 vs TEST 2: the outcome was different (OL2/MYDEBUG1/output.txt) but should have been the same. Checked ediff for config.card, stomate.card, sechiba.card, orchidee_ol.card, driver.def, stomate.def and sechiba.def: no differences except for the job name. On day 1 the total living biomass was around 400 gC/m2 in TEST 1 and only 40 gC/m2 in TEST 2. Looks like an intialisation issue. 
     64        * Conclusion TEST 1 vs TEST 2: the outcome was different (OL2/MYDEBUG1/output.txt) but should have been the same. Checked ediff for config.card, stomate.card, sechiba.card, orchidee_ol.card, driver.def, stomate.def and sechiba.def: no differences except for the job name. On day 1 the total living biomass was around 400 gC/m2 in TEST 1 and only 40 gC/m2 in TEST 2. Looks like an initialization issue. 
    6565        * Conclusion TEST 3: the new allocation appeared stable over 10 years for all tree PFT's 
    6666        * Conclusion TEST 2 vs TEST 3: new allocation has substantial less NPP due to substantial higher Ra