Changes between Version 105 and Version 106 of DevelopmentActivities/ORCHIDEE-CNP


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2016-06-28T17:05:54+02:00 (9 years ago)
Author:
dgoll
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • DevelopmentActivities/ORCHIDEE-CNP

    v105 v106  
    2424Several modification of the original OCN (Zaehle & Friend, 2010) in ORCHIDEE-CN were kicked out and the original formulation are used again. See code for details. 
    2525Still, the mineral N stocks are unrealistic high. One approach to solve this is to use the modification to OCN described in the SI of Zaehle et al. (2011) ([http://://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v4/n9/extref/ngeo1207-s1.pdf]). 
    26 The general problem is that several details were changed in the soil mineral N routine, which are not tested. And more modification are needed. 
    27 The easiest way would be to use the OCN formulation and parameters. They are well tested, while the ORCHIDEE-CN modification are not tested. 
     26 
     27The general problem with ORCHIDE-CN is that several details of soil mineral N were changed, which are all not tested. We can expect more issues. 
     28The easiest way would be to use the OCN formulation and parameters. OCN is well tested, while the ORCHIDEE-CN modification are not tested at all. 
    2829 
    2930=== 3.3 Biological N2 fixation (BNF) ===