| 300 | | === Pseudo sugar loading (CHECK) === |
| 301 | | The model code does not control the C/N ratio of the labile pool hence, even if there is a strong N-limitation, the model can accumulate lots of carbon in the labile pool. The first CN-version was indeed doing this as the plant could easily store several 1000 gC m-2. As this was considered unrealistic, the excess C in the labile pool was burned-off by some excess respiration. Although this luxury/wastage respiration has been suggested in the literature (see Amthor et al 2000 and Chamber et al 2004) it is not confirmed by many observations. It was therefore decided to control the size of the labile pool. The model already had an estimate of the optimal pool size of the labile and carbres pools. If the plant has more labile carbon than the optimal, GPP is downregulated (too much sugars in the leaves will increase the viscosity and hamper the sapflow in the phloem. The viscosity can be decreased again by closing the stomata and transpiring less of the sapflow in the xylem. By closing the stomata, GPP will be downregulated. See Holtta et al 2017 doi:10.1093/treephys/tpx011). Because ORCHIDEE has no sapflow, turgor and viscosity yet, we used a simple ratio to downregulate NUE. Hence, the feature was called '''pseudo sugar loading''' to make clear this is not the real thing yet. |
| | 298 | |
| | 299 | ++++DONE CHECKING++++ |
| | 300 | |
| | 301 | |
| | 302 | === Pseudo sugar loading (r6614) === |
| | 303 | The model code does not control the C/N ratio of the labile pool hence, even if there is a strong N-limitation, the model can accumulate lots of carbon in the labile pool. The first CN-version was indeed doing this as the plant could easily store several 1000 gC m-2. As this was considered unrealistic, the excess C in the labile pool was burned-off by some excess respiration. Although this luxury/wastage respiration has been suggested in the literature (see Amthor et al 2000 and Chamber et al 2004) it is not confirmed by many observations. It was therefore decided to control the size of the labile pool. The model already had an estimate of the optimal pool size of the labile and carbres pools. If the plant has more labile carbon than the optimal, GPP is downregulated because too much sugars in the leaves will increase the viscosity and hamper the sapflow in the phloem. The viscosity can be decreased again by closing the stomata and transpiring less of the sapflow in the xylem. By closing the stomata, GPP will be downregulated (Holtta et al 2017 doi:10.1093/treephys/tpx011). Because ORCHIDEE has no sapflow, turgor and viscosity yet, we used a simple ratio to downregulate NUE. Hence, the feature was called '''pseudo sugar loading''' to make clear this is not the real thing yet. |
