Changes between Version 10 and Version 11 of Documentation/TrunkFunctionality4

Timestamp:

2020-03-09T13:51:23+01:00 (4 years ago)

Author:

luyssaert

Comment:

--

Documentation/TrunkFunctionality4

@@ -92 +92 @@
 ORCHIDEE trunk 4 uses the allometric allocation as developed in O-CN. In ORCHIDEE trunk 4 the approach was adjusted to work for more than one diameter class. Since it was developed this allocation has been used in ORCHIDEE-CN and ORCHIDEE-CNP. In those branches only a single diameter class was used. Except for the way the reserves and labile pools are calculated (incl. the pseudo sugar loading), the allocation scheme remained rather similar between the aforementioned versions. The model is, however, very sensitive to the way the reserves and labile pools are calculated. The allocation makes use of a labile pool for which the activity is calculated based on the temperature. This sensitivity is important at the start and the end of the growing seasons when temperatures may be low. As such the model addresses the sink/source discussion initiated by Körner. Whereas this approach resulted in an acceptable interannual variability in for example NPP in ORCHIDEE-CAN, adding N seems to have dampen the interannual variability a lot/too much. This dampening was observed in ORCHIDEE-CN  and ORCHIDEE-CN-CAN. IN ORCHIDEE-CNP the temperature relationship was removed (hence NPP and GPP are strictly coupled) because the interannual variability became unrealistic. 
 
-ORCHIDEE-CN-CAN calculates the number of individuals and uses this as a criterion to initiate a stand replacing disturbance. This approach, guided by the self-thinning relationship, avoids the need for a stand-level turnover time. ORCHIDEE-CN, and ORCHIDEE-CNP still make use of stand-level turnover.
+
 
 There are no options to revert to the allocation based on resource limitation (Friedlingstein et al. 1999). All references and parameters for allocation based on resource limitation have been removed from the code (those that were overlooked can be removed). Allometric allocation makes use of the following PFT-specific parameters: '''sla''', '''tau_root''', '''tau_leaf''', '''tau_sap''', '''pipe_density''', '''tree_ff''', '''pipe_tune_x''', '''k_latosa_max''', and '''k_latosa_min'''. In addition to this set of parameters that mainly describe the allometric relationships and the longevity of the different tissues, the calculation of the allocation coefficients makes use PFT-specific tissue conductivities, i.e., '''k_sap''', '''k_belowground''', and '''k_leaf''' (see also plant water stress). Details on the parameters can be found in the SI of Naudts et al 2015 in GMD or in src_parameters/constantes_mtc.f90. 
@@ -224 +224 @@
 Both options have been developed, tested and can be used in ORCHIDEE-CN-CAN. However, because of the introduction of self-thinning (the third type of natural mortality) in ORCHIDEE-CN-CAN, '''constant_mortality''' = y soon became the default setting. In ORCHIDEE-CN-CAN, the total mortality is the maximum of the background mortality and the mortality from self-thinning. Only if self-thinning is absent or too low, background mortality will play a role. This approach implies that when '''constant_mortality''' = y is used in combination with self-thinning, background mortality will only play a role in the first years to decade before self-thinning starts. Despite its limited use, it represents an essential process: owing to background mortality, the number of individuals decreases, the remaining individuals grow faster and thus manage to reach self-thinning in a reasonable amount of time. It needs to be tested how the interplay between background mortality and self-thinning will work out when '''constant_mortality''' = n is used.
 
-Notice that the meaning of residence_time is very different between the CAN branch and the trunk.  In the trunk biomass has no age and thus the residence time accounts for all forest dynamics including self-thinning, pests, diseases and windthrow. In the CAN branch, biomass does have an age and self-thinning is explicitly accounted for, hence, the residence time should be much higher as it only accounts for pest, diseases and windthrow. Even the latter is not exact because as long as those disturbances are small scale they are probably accounted for in the parametrization of self-thinning.
+ORCHIDEE trunk 4 calculates the number of individuals and uses this as a criterion to initiate a stand replacing disturbance. This approach, guided by the self-thinning relationship, avoids the need for a stand-level turnover time. ORCHIDEE-CN, and ORCHIDEE-CNP still make use of stand-level turnover. Note that the meaning of residence_time is very different between the CAN branch and the trunk.  In the trunk biomass has no age and thus the residence time accounts for all forest dynamics including self-thinning, pests, diseases and windthrow. In the CAN branch, biomass does have an age and self-thinning is explicitly accounted for, hence, the residence time should be much higher as it only accounts for pest, diseases and windthrow. Even the latter is not exact because as long as those disturbances are small scale they are probably accounted for in the parametrization of self-thinning.
 
 === Nitrogen cycle (CHECK) ===