Changes between Version 7 and Version 8 of DevelopmentActivities/CMIP6/DevelopmentsCMIP6/zo_evaporation

Timestamp:

2016-01-14T09:51:09+01:00 (8 years ago)

Author:

fwang

Comment:

--

DevelopmentActivities/CMIP6/DevelopmentsCMIP6/zo_evaporation

@@ -145 +145 @@
  SU01Z0MH2: same as SU01Z0MH1, but u* by (2) method [[BR]]
 
- Results are shown in fig. z0mh_s01_mh_jan.pdf  [[BR]]
+ Results are shown in fig. z0mh_s01_mh_january.pdf  [[BR]]
  https://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/orchidee/attachment/wiki/DevelopmentActivities/CMIP6/DevelopmentsCMIP6/zo_evaporation/z0mh_s01_mh_january.pdf [[BR]]
  The impacts of using different u* on temp_sol can be as large as 1-2K for vegetated area. [[BR]]
 
-2. The results by using SU formula with cdrag (neutual) corrected: [[BR]]
+2. The results by using SU formula with cdrag (neutral) corrected: [[BR]]
  https://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/orchidee/attachment/wiki/DevelopmentActivities/CMIP6/DevelopmentsCMIP6/zo_evaporation/z0mh_SU.pdf [[BR]]
- In the figure, CTL means simulation using trunk. SU means simulation using SU formular (same as Nicolas V.). [[BR]]
+ The model is LMDZ(NPv3.2)+ORCHIDEE(CWRR). It is 1-year nudged simulation after spinup.  [[BR]]
+ In the figure, CTL means simulation using trunk. SU means simulation by changing z0m and z0h to SU's formula (same as Nicolas V. did). [[BR]]
  The Ts increases by ~0.5K for most regions with the maximum increases being 1-1.5 K (JJA over desert).  [[BR]]
- The latent heat flux decreases by ~3W/m2 for most regions. [[BR]]
+ The latent heat flux decreases by ~ 3-6 W/m2 for most regions. [[BR]]