Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of DevelopmentActivities/Bugs

Timestamp:

2015-12-02T14:29:46+01:00 (9 years ago)

Author:

ajornet

Comment:

--

DevelopmentActivities/Bugs

@@ -4 +4 @@
 
 == List ==
+
+=== PFT maps and Analytic spinup with DGVM ===
+
+You have a list in pft_parameters:
+
+{{{
+      !! 5.1 Read the name of the PFTs given by the user
+      !
+      !Config Key   = PFT_NAME
+      !Config Desc  = Name of a PFT
+      !Config if    = OK_SECHIBA or OK_STOMATE
+      !Config Def   = bare ground, tropical broad-leaved evergreen, tropical broad-leaved raingreen,
+      !Config         temperate needleleaf evergreen, temperate broad-leaved evergreen temperate broad-leaved summergreen,
+      !Config         boreal needleleaf evergreen, boreal broad-leaved summergreen, boreal needleleaf summergreen,
+      !Config         C3 grass, C4 grass, C3 agriculture, C4 agriculture
+      !Config Help  = the user can name the new PFTs he/she introducing for new species
+      !Config Units = [-]
+      CALL getin_p('PFT_NAME',pft_name)
+}}}
+
+This is independent from Chao's problem. I'm looking at DGVM without SPITFIRE. In dynamic mode, we have first crops but natural PFTs appear later: grasses and after a few years trees. At least that's how it behaves with the TRUNK version.
+
+=== Spitfire ===
+
+* There are regative values at fuel_XXhr variables
+* Multiple floating point exceptions at reat_of_spread
+
+=== VSD merge ===
+
+How to deal with already designed MICT soil layers ?
+
+
+Hi Shushi,
+
+I made a mystake last Monday because the new vertical discretization had not yet been integrated in Albert's personal branch. Albert is now working on it and we have a few questions.
+
+In Albert's branch, we have two possible different sets of values for soil_capa and soil_cond based on the keyword SOIL_LAYERS_DISCRE_METHOD (see constantes_soil.f90 and get_discretization_constants in thermosoil.f90).
+
+This gives access to two different vertical discretization shemes (see thermosoil_levels). I copied all this relevant code below.
+
+
+1. Do we agree that we completely let down these two discretization schemes to get the new one (see vertical_soil_init)?
+
+2. I have the impression that soil_capa and soil_cond may intervene elsewhere, do we still keep the two different sets of values?
+
+=== New Drivers ===
+
+Test performance