Changes between Version 3 and Version 4 of DevelopmentActivities/AccelerationSpinup

Timestamp:

2011-06-22T10:00:22+02:00 (13 years ago)

Author:

dsolyga

Comment:

--

DevelopmentActivities/AccelerationSpinup

@@ -50 +50 @@
 So we have to take into account 2 more fluxes in the matrix.            
 
+We decided not to have the same stopping condition used by PASIM. We want for the moment to evaluate 
+the relative error for each carbon pool and to consider the maximum of all these errors.
+
+== Implementation of the method in ORCHIDEE ==
+
+Here you find a text file which explains the implemntation in ORCHIDEE (compare with the original papers) :
+
+
+== Validation of the method ==
+
+The most difficult part is the validation of the method. We have to solve many problems to find the good
+setup. Moreover, we want ORCHIDEE to stop when the stopping criterion is reached even if the job is not
+finished. 
+
+Finally, we consider the following reference job :[[BR]]
+
+- Full Orchidee (sechiba + stomate, no forcesoil)[[BR]]
+
+- Calendar type : no_leap (we modify a forcing file for the year 1982)
+
+- One grid cell ((6°-7°lon,49°-50°lat + IMPOSE_VEG=y (20% bare soil, 80% C3 grass))
+
+- Length of the simulation : 7000Y
+
+- loop on the same forcing file (option norestart=y in COMP/driver.card + modification in readdim2.f90)
+
+- Annual outputs
+
+The results are accessible on /dmnfs12/cont003/p529sol/IGCM_OUT/OL2/OOL_SEC_STO7000Y. The results obtained
+are (gC/m²) :
+{{{
+1. litter_str_ab : 2339
+2. litter_str_be : 559.2
+3. litter_met_ab : 142
+4. litter_met_be :  55
+5. carbon active : 253
+6. carbon slow : 5873
+7. carbon passive : 9226
+}}}
+