| 67 | | First, the time is defined without ambiguity from the initial time and the nb of records that were read. Second, when we read a flux at the record itau_n, we perfectly know to which interval it corresponds. For WFDEI for instance, we know from http://www.eu-watch.org/gfx_content/documents/README-WFDEI%20(v2016).pdf that the record at itau_n holds the average flux over the 3-hourly period that precedes the "time stamp" of itau_n (t0+dt according to the above notations). This is perfectly clear, perfectly coherent with the first panel of the above graphic, and tractable by dim2driver with the good values of inter_lin and netrad_cons. |
| | 67 | First, the time is defined without ambiguity from the initial time and the nb of records that were read. Second, when we read a flux at the record itau_n, we perfectly know to which interval it corresponds. For WFDEI for instance, we know from http://www.eu-watch.org/gfx_content/documents/README-WFDEI%20(v2016).pdf that the record at itau_n holds the average flux over the 3-hourly period that precedes the "time stamp" of itau_n ([t0,t0+dt] according to the above notations). '''It does not mean that LW(itau_n) is only "valid" at one instant over [t0,t0+dt]''' as suggested above. This is perfectly clear, perfectly coherent with the first panel of the above graphic, and tractable by dim2driver with the good values of inter_lin and netrad_cons. |
