Changes between Version 22 and Version 23 of Branches/Driver_Improvements

Timestamp:

2016-05-27T12:22:12+02:00 (8 years ago)

Author:

jpolcher

Comment:

--

Branches/Driver_Improvements

@@ -44 +44 @@
 The time-stepping is done independently from the physical time. Thus it is the choice of the physical time at ''n=1'' which will determine at which dates the values of the forcing at ''n-1'' and ''n'' are valid. This poses no problem for instantaneous variables in the forcing file as then the indexing space (''n'') and the physical time are identical.
 
-The issue becomes more complicated when we consider fluxes which are averaged over an interval. We can only make the assumption that the time corresponding to index ''n'' is within the time interval of the average. But we in readim2.f90 we have no way of knowing if it is at the start, end or anywhere else.
+The issue becomes more complicated when we consider fluxes which are averaged over an interval. The only valid assumption is that the dates corresponding to index ''n'' is within the time interval over which the average was performed. In readim2.f90 there is no information if the date of n is at the start, end or anywhere else within the averaging period.
 
 The graphic below explains probably better the above description.