| | 1 | === 12 Mai 2024 === |
| | 2 | |
| | 3 | * Brady's analysis |
| | 4 | |
| | 5 | when removing global SST trend from coupled ensemble, spatial pattern of EOF1 resembles more to that of AMIP ensemble, yet still some differences |
| | 6 | |
| | 7 | and correlation drops in between PCs => maybe there are not so much in common between coupled and AMIP ensemble |
| | 8 | |
| | 9 | pending question : why atmospheric structure (warming of tropical troposphere associated with cooling of extratropical stratosphere) very active in both coupled and forced simulations, and seems to dominate diversity in ensembles ? |
| | 10 | |
| | 11 | second pending question : what controls coupled ensemble diversity, besides global SST (possibly related with fallv, tropical warming and stratospheric extratropical cooling...) ? |
| | 12 | |
| | 13 | comparing forest-importance and sobol for PC1, toplCRE and sa150 (Brady's index in stratosphere) : same predominant parameters (FALLV and OMEPMX for the last two) for all ensembles, but different for PC1 => coupled ensemble may be influenced by other modes of variability than toplCRE, sa150 and global SST... |
| | 14 | |
| | 15 | * quel lien entre les differents TOA imbalance ? |
| | 16 | |
| | 17 | 2.7 W/m2 : cible AMIP pour que IPSLCM6ALR soit à la bonne SST globale |
| | 18 | |
| | 19 | 0.9 W/m2 : non conservation de chaleur de IPSLCM6ALR, principalement dans l'atmosphere |
| | 20 | |
| | 21 | 5 W/m2 : serait la cible AMIP pour IPSLCM6.5.2, d'apres ensemble tuning |
| | 22 | |
| | 23 | ???? W/m2 : la cible pour IPSLCM7 AMIP (avec 95 niveaux) pour que le couplé IPSLCM7 ait la bonne SST globale ? |
| | 24 | |
| | 25 | * breve discussion autour de l'effet potentiel de pmagic sur l'ensemble couplé (pdCtrl) |
| | 26 | |
| | 27 | |
| | 28 | |
| | 29 | |
| | 30 | |
| | 31 | |
| | 32 | |
| | 33 | |
